Strictly from Hunger
Strictly from hunger. Ever hear this phrase? You have to be of a certain vintage to have heard it in everyday conversation. What does it mean? That something is busted. Nowhere. Just seriously lacking. Unbeknownst to me, though, until I googled the term this morning, Strictly from Hunger was also the title of an apparently very famous “psychedelic” album made by the Portland, Oregon, group Hunger in 1969.
That’s their picture.
After my husband and I simultaneously used this term to describe something this morning, he dared me to blog about it. “So what would the actual topic be?” I asked. “I don’t know. Just use it as the title and start.”
So here I go — hopefully, there will be enough examples of things that are strictly from hunger that you, too, can use this colorful term in your everyday discourse.
Things that are STRICTLY FROM HUNGER:
1. Using a ballpoint point on easel paper while leading a group discussion.
2. Related to #1 – having crummy, used up markers.
3. Not having coffee at meetings.
4. Running out of copies.
5. LCD projectors with no remote.
6. Occasions where you have to show a great PowerPoint on the equivalent of a white sheet hung up with tacks.
7. Conference luncheons with no dessert.
8. Office Depot pens.
9. Knock-off Play-Doh. Seriously, if you’re a hotshot meeting facilitator, you know the value of real Play-Doh. Don’t be fooled into buying the cheap stuff at the Dollar Store because it’s…….STRICTLY FROM HUNGER!
10.Running out of food at a community event. This is STRICTLY FROM HUNGER because it shows failure to plan, over-concern about cost, and unwillingness to deal with leftovers. Plus, depending on the crowd, it can be very risky.
There. See? Now the next time you see something that’s strictly from hunger, you’ll know what to call it.
This morning, my local baseball expert explained to me the logic of Brewers manager Ron Roenicke sticking with the rotation in the 6th game of the National League Championship Series despite Shaun Marcum’s grim performance in Game 2. “If he (Roenicke) picks somebody else to pitch, Marcum might never recover,” said my expert. He went on to explain how the Brewers had sacrificed a lot to get Marcum and that passing him over in favor of someone else could essentially damage the goods long term, which in baseball parlance, means next year. 